Skip to Content

EtherNet/IP vs Profinet vs Modbus TCP: choosing the right fieldbus for a new line

Ports, timing, device files, redundancy and hardware compared, and how to choose the protocol for a new line
September 17, 2026 by
EtherNet/IP vs Profinet vs Modbus TCP: choosing the right fieldbus for a new line
Joan F. Aubets - Industrial Shields

Short answer: choose Modbus TCP for simple I/O, monitoring and SCADA links where a few milliseconds of jitter do not matter; EtherNet/IP if the plant runs on Rockwell (Allen-Bradley) controllers; and Profinet if it runs on Siemens controllers or the process needs isochronous motion control. All three run on standard Ethernet cabling, but they differ in timing, device description files, redundancy and the hardware they ask for.

In practice the existing controller ecosystem decides more than raw speed: a new line usually follows the brand of its main PLC, and Modbus TCP or OPC UA connect that line to SCADA, MES and data systems.

EtherNet/IP vs Profinet vs Modbus TCP: comparison table

Modbus TCPEtherNet/IPProfinet
Maintained byModbus OrganizationODVAPROFIBUS & PROFINET International (PI)
TransportTCP, port 502 (Modbus/TCP Security over TLS: port 802)Explicit messages over TCP port 44818, implicit I/O over UDP port 2222RT and IRT frames directly on Ethernet (EtherType 0x8892, no IP); configuration and diagnostics over UDP/IP
Communication modelClient and server: the client polls registers and coilsCIP connections: scanner and adapter exchange I/O cyclically at a configured RPIIO controller and IO device exchange cyclic data at a configured update time
TimingBest effort: depends on the polling rate, the server and the network loadPredictable cyclic I/O; CIP Sync (IEEE 1588) and CIP Motion for synchronised axesRT for most I/O; IRT (conformance class C) reaches cycles of 31.25 µs with about 1 µs of jitter
Device description fileNone: the register map comes from the device manualEDSGSDML
Network hardwareAny Ethernet switchStandard switches; managed switches with IGMP snooping when I/O is multicastRT works on standard switches (PI recommends Profinet-ready switches); IRT needs IRT-capable devices and switches on the whole path
Ring redundancyNot in the protocolDLR (Device Level Ring)MRP (Media Redundancy Protocol)
Functional safety profileNo standard profileCIP SafetyPROFIsafe
Typical ecosystemVendor neutral: meters, drives, gateways, SCADARockwell / Allen-BradleySiemens
Best fitMonitoring, simple I/O, energy meters, retrofit data collectionMachine control on Rockwell linesMachine control on Siemens lines, drives and motion

Cycle figures depend on the devices and the network design. Use the table to compare the protocols, then check the datasheets of the controller and devices you will actually install.

Modbus TCP: simplicity first, timing second

Modbus TCP wraps the Modbus application protocol in a TCP connection to port 502, with a 7 byte MBAP header in front of each request. A client polls a server and the server replies: there is no cyclic I/O channel, no time synchronisation and no ring redundancy in the protocol. The update time is whatever the client polling rate, the server response and the network allow.

In exchange, it is open, documented and light. Almost any PLC, meter, drive or gateway speaks it, it works through any Ethernet switch, and a small library is enough to implement it. Several clients can read the same server, up to the connection limit of the device. Plain Modbus TCP has no authentication or encryption; the Modbus/TCP Security specification adds TLS on port 802, but few field devices support it yet, so keep Modbus TCP inside a segmented OT network.

EtherNet/IP: CIP objects over standard Ethernet

EtherNet/IP carries the Common Industrial Protocol (CIP), managed by ODVA, over TCP and UDP. It has two kinds of messages:

  • Explicit messaging over TCP port 44818, for configuration, parameters and diagnostics, on request.
  • Implicit (I/O) messaging over UDP port 2222, for cyclic, time critical data. Each connection has a requested packet interval (RPI) set in milliseconds by the scanner.

Devices are described by EDS files. Device Level Ring (DLR) gives ring redundancy through devices with two ports and an embedded switch, and CIP Safety carries safety data on the same network. For coordinated motion, CIP Sync distributes time with IEEE 1588 and CIP Motion uses it to synchronise drives. It is the default choice in Rockwell plants because drives, safety I/O and HMIs in that ecosystem already speak it.

Profinet: real time on layer 2, isochronous on hardware

Profinet IO, from PROFIBUS & PROFINET International (PI), sends cyclic I/O as RT frames directly on Ethernet, without IP, and uses UDP/IP only for configuration, diagnostics and acyclic data. Devices are described by GSDML files and identified by a station name that the engineering tool assigns with the DCP protocol.

PI defines three conformance classes that build on each other:

  • CC-A: real time cyclic data, standard alarms and diagnostics, topology support.
  • CC-B: adds SNMP, so network statistics and topology can be read with standard tools.
  • CC-C: adds isochronous real time (IRT), with cycles down to 31.25 µs and about 1 µs of jitter, for motion control and drive synchronisation. IRT needs hardware support in every device and switch of the path.

Media Redundancy Protocol (MRP) closes the line into a ring, and PROFIsafe carries safety data. Commissioning is more structured than with Modbus TCP: names, topology and GSDML files must match the project, which pays back in precise diagnostics.

How to choose the fieldbus for a new line in five questions

  1. Which controller brand runs the plant? Rockwell points to EtherNet/IP, Siemens to Profinet. Fighting the ecosystem costs more than any protocol difference.
  2. Do you need synchronised axes? Coordinated motion needs Profinet IRT or CIP Sync with CIP Motion. Modbus TCP is not built for it.
  3. Do safety functions travel on the network? Then you need PROFIsafe or CIP Safety with certified devices, or hardwired safety that the PLC only reads.
  4. Do you need ring redundancy? Plan MRP or DLR from the design stage and buy devices that support it.
  5. Is it monitoring, energy or a link to SCADA? Modbus TCP, MQTT or OPC UA are enough, and any open controller can provide them.

SCADA and MES rarely use the protocol of the machine network

Few plants run one protocol end to end. A common pattern: Profinet or EtherNet/IP on the machine network for real time control, and Modbus TCP, MQTT or OPC UA one level up for SCADA, historian and MES, because that level needs broad compatibility more than microsecond timing. The comparison of Modbus RTU, Modbus TCP and OPC UA covers that upper level in detail.

A gateway that reads the machine controller on one side and publishes Modbus TCP or MQTT on the other is often where a retrofit or IIoT project starts, without touching the machine network.

Which protocols an open source based PLC can use

ProtocolIndustrial Shields hardwareHow
Modbus TCPM-Duino (Ethernet), ESP32 PLC, Raspberry PLC, GateBerryOpen source libraries, client and server. See Modbus TCP master on Arduino and ESP32 PLCs and the Modbus guide for Raspberry PLC
ProfinetRaspberry PLCOpen source p-net stack as an IO device, or CODESYS as IO controller: Profinet on Linux and Profinet alarms with CODESYS. For commercial use, check the CODESYS license terms.
EtherNet/IPRaspberry PLCWith CODESYS Control for Raspberry Pi SL, which includes the EtherNet/IP Scanner and Adapter. Check the CODESYS license terms first: see CODESYS on a Raspberry PLC.

For a new line, follow the existing controller ecosystem. To pull data out of machines that already run Profinet or EtherNet/IP, the fastest route is usually a gateway such as GateBerry, which reads the machine PLC through an interface it already exposes (often OPC UA, Modbus TCP or the vendor protocol) and publishes Modbus TCP or MQTT for the reporting layer. The retrofit then needs no native fieldbus stack on the new controller. To pick the controller for that retrofit, see M-Duino or Ardbox for a retrofit and the M-Duino range.

Take it further

Modbus TCP is the quickest way to connect a PLC to a SCADA. See it in a real project, in a network simulator and as a register map.

FAQ about EtherNet/IP, Profinet and Modbus TCP

Is Profinet faster than EtherNet/IP?

For ordinary I/O both give cyclic updates in the millisecond range, and the devices limit the cycle more than the protocol. For isochronous motion, Profinet IRT reaches cycles of 31.25 µs on IRT hardware, and EtherNet/IP uses CIP Sync and CIP Motion to synchronise drives.

Can Modbus TCP and Profinet run on the same network?

Yes. Profinet RT frames and Modbus TCP traffic can share switches, and Profinet RT frames carry VLAN priority. Keep the Modbus TCP load moderate on machine networks, and use separate VLANs or networks when the timing is critical.

Does Modbus TCP need special switches?

No. Modbus TCP is ordinary TCP traffic on port 502 and works through any Ethernet switch. Managed industrial switches still help with diagnostics, VLANs and segmentation.

Which ports do EtherNet/IP and Modbus TCP use?

Modbus TCP uses TCP port 502, and 802 for Modbus/TCP Security over TLS. EtherNet/IP uses TCP port 44818 for explicit messages and UDP port 2222 for implicit I/O. Profinet RT does not use IP ports: its frames go directly on Ethernet.

Can an Arduino or Raspberry Pi based PLC talk Profinet or EtherNet/IP?

A Raspberry PLC can run the open source p-net stack as a Profinet IO device, or CODESYS with its fieldbus components. Arduino and ESP32 based PLCs use Modbus TCP natively; for Profinet or EtherNet/IP lines, place a gateway between the machine network and the data layer.

Is EtherNet/IP the same as Ethernet?

No. Ethernet is the physical and data link layer. EtherNet/IP is an industrial application protocol, CIP, that runs on top of Ethernet with TCP and UDP. The "IP" stands for Industrial Protocol.

​Search in our Blog

EtherNet/IP vs Profinet vs Modbus TCP: choosing the right fieldbus for a new line
Joan F. Aubets - Industrial Shields September 17, 2026
Share this post
Tags

Looking for your ideal Programmable Logic Controller?

Take a look at this product comparison with other industrial controllers Arduino-based. 

We are comparing inputs, outputs, communications and other features with the ones of the relevant brands.

PLC Comparison